Showing posts with label overall. Show all posts
Showing posts with label overall. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

Requirements in Dress


The First Requirement: Extent of Covering

The dress must cover the whole body except the areas specifically exempted. The Qur’an states:
dress
“Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for greater purity for them: And Allah is well acquainted with all that they do. And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husband’s sons, their brothers, or their brother’s sons, or their women, or their slaves whom their right hand possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O you believers! Turn all toward Allah that you may attain bliss.” (Surat-un- Nur 24:30-31)
These ‘ayahs contain, among other things, two main injunctions:
1. A Muslim woman should not display her beauty and adornment (zeenah) except for ‘that which must ordinarily appear of it’: (ma dhahara minha), or ‘that which is apparent.’
The word zeenah lends itself to two related meanings:
a) natural or bodily beauty, and;
b) acquired adornment such as a ring, bracelet’s, and clothes.
The part of zeenah, exempted from the above injunction, was interpreted in two ways: a. The face and the hands. This is the interpretation of the majority of the jurists, past and present. This interpretation is confirmed by ijma (consensus) that a Muslim woman is allowed by Islam to uncover her face and hands during pilgrimage and even during the prayers, while the rest of her body is regarded as ‘awrah (that which should be covered). This interpretation is based on the authority of Prophet Muhammad (Allah’s blessings be upon him), especially the hadith in which he says:
dress“‘...If a woman reaches the age of puberty, no part of her body should be seen but this’ – and he pointed to his face and hands.”
Whatever appears of the woman’s body owing to uncontrollable factors such as blowing of the wind, or out of necessity such as the bracelet’s or even the outer clothes themselves.
2. The headcovers (khumur) should be drawn over the neck slits (juyoob), khumur is the plural of the Arabic word “khimar” which means a headcover. Juyoob is the plural of the Arabic word “jaiyb” (a derivative of jawb or cutting) refers to the neck slit (of the dress). This means that the headcover should be drawn so as to cover not only the hair, but it should also be drawn over the neck and be extended so as to cover the bosom.

The Second Requirement: Looseness

The dress must be loose enough so as not to describe the shape of a woman’s body. This is consistent with the intent of the ; ’Ayahs cited above (24:30-31) and is surely a crucial aspect of hiding zeenah. Even moderately - tight clothes which cover the whole body do describe the shape of the attractive parts of the woman’s bustline, the waist, the buttocks, the back and the thighs. If these are not part of the natural beauty or zeenah what else is?
Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) once received a thick garment as a gift. He gave it toOsamah b. Zayd, who in turn gave it to his wife. When asked by the Prophet why he did not wear it, Osamah indicated that he gave it to his wife. The Prophet then said to Osamah “ask her to use a gholalah under it (the garment) for I fear that it (the garment) may describe the size of her bones.”
A highly desirable way of concealing the shape of the body is to wear a cloak over that garment. The prophet (peace be upon him), however, indicated that if the woman’s dress meets the Islamic standards it suffices (without a cloak) even for the validity of prayers.

The Third Requirement: Thickness

The dress should be thick enough so as not to show the colour of the skin it covers, or the shape of the body which it is supposed to hide.
The purpose of ‘ayah (24:31) is to hide the Muslim women’s body except ma dhahara minha (the face and hands). It is obvious that this purpose cannot be served if the dress is thin enough so as to reveal the colour of the skin or the shape or beauty of the body. This eloquently explained by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him):
“In later (generations) of my ummah there will be women who will be dressed but naked. On the top of their heads (what looks) like camel humps. Curse them for they are truly cursed.” In another version he added that they “will not enter into paradise or (even) get a smell of it.”
“If the woman reaches the age of puberty, no part of her body should be seen, but this,” and he pointed to his face and hands.
Hadith
On one occasion Asma’ (daughter of Abu Bakr) was visiting her sister ‘A’ishah, wife of the Prophet. When the prophet (peace be upon him) noted that Asma’s dress was not thick enough he turned his face away in anger and said, 
“If the woman reaches the age of puberty, no part of her body should be seen, but this,” and he pointed to his face and hands.

The Fourth Requirement: Overall Appearance

The dress should not be such that it attracts men’s attention to the woman’s beauty. The Qur’an clearly prescribes the requirements of the woman’s dress for the purpose of concealing zeenah (adornment). How could such zeenah be concealed if the dress is designd in a way that it attracts men’s eyes to the woman?
This is why the Qur’an addressing the Prophet’s wives as the examples for the Muslim women says:
“Bedizen not yourself with the bedizenment of the Time of Ignorance...” (Surat al-Ahzab 33:33)

Sunday, 10 July 2011

For Americas "99ers," jobs crisis is hard to escape






SEWELL, New Jersey



Mary Kay Coyne has just filed what she says is her 1,862nd job application since being thrown out of work three years ago.
She is one of millions of Americans whose unemployment benefits have expired -- after 99 weeks in many states -- as the United States suffers its highest level of long-term unemployment since 1948.
Coyne had to move in with a friend after benefit payments ran out last year. Now she gets by on Medicaid -- U.S. health insurance for the poor -- and food stamps, contributing what little she can to her friend's household costs.





"You're 56-years old and you feel like you are sitting on a big pile of nothing," said Coyne, who spends about four hours a day sending out resumes.
"For the better part of a year, I have something sitting on my chest. It's not a medical condition. It is that pressure of 'Is this going to end, when is this going to end?'"

Unlike in much of Europe, the safety net of the U.S. welfare system times out for the long-term unemployed. The federal government and many states have provided extra help for those caught up in the worst labor market in decades but the U.S. debt crisis rules out further extension of the programs.
Coyne is typical of many middle-class Americans now struggling to get by.

She used to earn $70,000 a year as an administrative assistant until her firm began to downsize and left Coyne among the growing number of Americans struggling to live on unemployment benefits, and eventually on minimal food aid.

Now Washington is considering cuts to social welfare programs to shrink a swelling budget deficit.
It may not only be Americans like Coyne who feel the pain. Some economists say the cuts could make it even harder to shrink long-term unemployment that damages the wider economy by dampening consumer demand and lowering output.

In 2010, an estimated 3.9 million unemployed Americans exhausted unemployment benefits, according to the National Employment Law Project, an advocacy group that campaigns for lower-wage workers.
More than 14 percent of the U.S. unemployed have been out of a job for 99 weeks, or longer.
May saw the second-highest percentage and outright number of Americans out of a job for that period or more since weekly data was first collected in 1967. The highest was in April. Payrolls data for June, due on Friday, is unlikely to show a major change in the labor market after the overall jobless rate rose to 9.1 percent in May, economists say.

Many so-called "99ers" subsist on social services like food stamps and Medicaid, programs now in danger of deep cuts demanded by many Republicans in Congress in exchange for allowing the federal government to go deeper into debt.

"An increase in demand for social services is what you would expect in a downturn of this magnitude and so the fact that they are cutting the social safety net is quite perplexing," said Sylvia Allegretto, a labor economist at the University of California at Berkeley. "We've just never seen (long-term unemployment) at these levels, period."

Forty six percent of those looking for work have been jobless for six months or more and the average length of job searches that eventually result in a hiring has doubled to 10 weeks between 2007 and 2010.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More