Friday, 16 September 2011

Most Asian nations realising Internet cannot be tamed

  It's not just dictators. Governments around the world, many of them popularly elected, have tried for years to control the Internet and social media, dismayed by their potential to incite violence, spread mischief and distribute pornography and dissent.

But in Asia, home to everything from free-wheeling democracies to totalitarian regimes and others in between, many governments are increasingly realising that controlling online content, including dissent, just will not work.

Even China, which strongly regulates the Internet and is grappling with how to deal with the extremely popular microblogs read by hundreds of millions of its people, is highly unlikely to block them completely.

"Governments are committing quite a bit of resources and time to block websites and I think it's a panic reaction," says Phil Robertson, Bangkok-based deputy director of the Asia division of Human Rights Watch.

"They have some temporary, immediate discouraging effect but over the longer term, they won't be effective because people will still find a way to get the news they want to hear.

"Once people have been exposed to the Internet and see the power of getting information free to your computer, it's a very addictive feeling of empowerment."

That snowballing of sentiment has played out this year in Egypt, Libya and Tunisia, where governments have been overthrown by movements bolstered by the Internet. The United States tried to block dissemination of the WikiLeaks cables and British Prime Minister David Cameron threatened to temporarily censor social networking sites after riots last month.

Asia is also learning first-hand about the ubiquitous power of the wired world.

In India, authorities were taken aback last month when an anti-corruption campaign multiplied on Facebook, Twitter and other social networking sites and drew tens of thousands of people to protest sites.

But there were no signs the government tried in any way to crack down on the online crusade, even if it could have.

"At the rate in which it gained momentum, I don't think the government actually had the time to ban the movement," said Vijay Mukhi, a cyber-security expert.

Monday, 12 September 2011

India probes transfusions after 23 kids get HIV

At least 23 children who received blood transfusions have tested positive for HIV, Indian officials said on Monday as authorities launched an investigation into a government hospital.
The infected children, aged between five to 10 years, suffer from thalassaemia, a rare genetic disorder that requires regular transfusions. Parents said their children received fresh blood at a public hospital in Junagadh district in the western state of Gujarat, 315 kilometres (195 miles) from the city of Ahmedabad.
"We have initiated an inquiry into the case. This is a very serious matter," the state's principal health secretary Rajesh Kishore told  without giving further details. All the 23 children had received free blood transfusions between January and August, reports said.




Earlier, Gujarat's health minister Jay Narayan Vyas told reporters that the children may have been infected after receiving blood "at some other places" but parents have blamed tainted blood at the government hospital.
He also said some pre-transfusion tests at another state-run hospital had found that the children already had been infected with HIV. Indian government estimates that about 2.5 million Indians are living with HIV

Tuesday, 16 August 2011

Requirements in Dress


The First Requirement: Extent of Covering

The dress must cover the whole body except the areas specifically exempted. The Qur’an states:
dress
“Say to the believing men that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that will make for greater purity for them: And Allah is well acquainted with all that they do. And say to the believing women that they should lower their gaze and guard their modesty: that they should not display their beauty and ornaments except what (must ordinarily) appear thereof; that they should draw their veils over their bosoms and not display their beauty except to their husbands, their fathers, their husband’s fathers, their sons, their husband’s sons, their brothers, or their brother’s sons, or their women, or their slaves whom their right hand possess, or male servants free of physical needs, or small children who have no sense of the shame of sex; and that they should not strike their feet in order to draw attention to their hidden ornaments. And O you believers! Turn all toward Allah that you may attain bliss.” (Surat-un- Nur 24:30-31)
These ‘ayahs contain, among other things, two main injunctions:
1. A Muslim woman should not display her beauty and adornment (zeenah) except for ‘that which must ordinarily appear of it’: (ma dhahara minha), or ‘that which is apparent.’
The word zeenah lends itself to two related meanings:
a) natural or bodily beauty, and;
b) acquired adornment such as a ring, bracelet’s, and clothes.
The part of zeenah, exempted from the above injunction, was interpreted in two ways: a. The face and the hands. This is the interpretation of the majority of the jurists, past and present. This interpretation is confirmed by ijma (consensus) that a Muslim woman is allowed by Islam to uncover her face and hands during pilgrimage and even during the prayers, while the rest of her body is regarded as ‘awrah (that which should be covered). This interpretation is based on the authority of Prophet Muhammad (Allah’s blessings be upon him), especially the hadith in which he says:
dress“‘...If a woman reaches the age of puberty, no part of her body should be seen but this’ – and he pointed to his face and hands.”
Whatever appears of the woman’s body owing to uncontrollable factors such as blowing of the wind, or out of necessity such as the bracelet’s or even the outer clothes themselves.
2. The headcovers (khumur) should be drawn over the neck slits (juyoob), khumur is the plural of the Arabic word “khimar” which means a headcover. Juyoob is the plural of the Arabic word “jaiyb” (a derivative of jawb or cutting) refers to the neck slit (of the dress). This means that the headcover should be drawn so as to cover not only the hair, but it should also be drawn over the neck and be extended so as to cover the bosom.

The Second Requirement: Looseness

The dress must be loose enough so as not to describe the shape of a woman’s body. This is consistent with the intent of the ; ’Ayahs cited above (24:30-31) and is surely a crucial aspect of hiding zeenah. Even moderately - tight clothes which cover the whole body do describe the shape of the attractive parts of the woman’s bustline, the waist, the buttocks, the back and the thighs. If these are not part of the natural beauty or zeenah what else is?
Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) once received a thick garment as a gift. He gave it toOsamah b. Zayd, who in turn gave it to his wife. When asked by the Prophet why he did not wear it, Osamah indicated that he gave it to his wife. The Prophet then said to Osamah “ask her to use a gholalah under it (the garment) for I fear that it (the garment) may describe the size of her bones.”
A highly desirable way of concealing the shape of the body is to wear a cloak over that garment. The prophet (peace be upon him), however, indicated that if the woman’s dress meets the Islamic standards it suffices (without a cloak) even for the validity of prayers.

The Third Requirement: Thickness

The dress should be thick enough so as not to show the colour of the skin it covers, or the shape of the body which it is supposed to hide.
The purpose of ‘ayah (24:31) is to hide the Muslim women’s body except ma dhahara minha (the face and hands). It is obvious that this purpose cannot be served if the dress is thin enough so as to reveal the colour of the skin or the shape or beauty of the body. This eloquently explained by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him):
“In later (generations) of my ummah there will be women who will be dressed but naked. On the top of their heads (what looks) like camel humps. Curse them for they are truly cursed.” In another version he added that they “will not enter into paradise or (even) get a smell of it.”
“If the woman reaches the age of puberty, no part of her body should be seen, but this,” and he pointed to his face and hands.
Hadith
On one occasion Asma’ (daughter of Abu Bakr) was visiting her sister ‘A’ishah, wife of the Prophet. When the prophet (peace be upon him) noted that Asma’s dress was not thick enough he turned his face away in anger and said, 
“If the woman reaches the age of puberty, no part of her body should be seen, but this,” and he pointed to his face and hands.

The Fourth Requirement: Overall Appearance

The dress should not be such that it attracts men’s attention to the woman’s beauty. The Qur’an clearly prescribes the requirements of the woman’s dress for the purpose of concealing zeenah (adornment). How could such zeenah be concealed if the dress is designd in a way that it attracts men’s eyes to the woman?
This is why the Qur’an addressing the Prophet’s wives as the examples for the Muslim women says:
“Bedizen not yourself with the bedizenment of the Time of Ignorance...” (Surat al-Ahzab 33:33)

UK to tackle social problems after riots

Britain needs to tackle deep-seated social problems following riots and looting in English cities this week, the centre-right govt said, and a US street crime expert it has brought in said arrests alone would not solve the problem. 

“There are communities that have just been left behind by the rest of the country. There are communities that are cut-off from the economic life-blood of the rest of the country,” Finance Minister George Osborne said.
Prime Minister David Cameron, criticised by some in his Conservative party as being too liberal on crime and punishment, has taken a hard line on rioting in statements this week after returning from his summer holiday and recalling parliament.
He has also come under attack for austerity measures his government is introducing to tackle a huge debt burden.
Osborne said the government intends to press on with deep cuts to police numbers. The Conservative mayor of London, Boris Johnson, has said the riots weakened the case for those cuts.
watch in this video





The riots broke out a week ago after a demonstration against the police shooting of a suspect.
Cameron has said political and economic grievances had little to do with days of looting and violence in which five people were killed, calling it “criminality pure and simple” and saying gang violence lay at its heart.
He enlisted U.S. street crime expert William Bratton on Friday to advise the government on handling it.
Bratton, credited with curbing street crime as police chief in New York, Los Angeles and Boston, told Reuters on Friday he would offer advice based on his experience tackling gangs.
“You can’t arrest your way out of the problem,” he said on U.S. broadcaster ABC on Saturday. “Arrest is certainly appropriate for the most violent, the incorrigible, but so much of it can be addressed in other ways and it’s not just a police issue, it is in fact a societal issue.”
Cities were largely quiet on Friday and Saturday. British police flooded the streets again on Friday night to ensure weekend drinking does not reignite the rioting that shocked Britons and sullied the country’s image a year before it hosts the Olympic Games.
More than 1,200 people have been arrested in connection with violence disorder and looting and hundreds have been charged.

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More